[ncc-services-wg] 2012-07 Discussion Period extended until 21 February 2013 (RIPE NCC Service to Legacy Internet Resource Holders)

On 04/02/2013 09:02, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
> Which we will.   We are trying to create a policy/framework to regulate NCC
> services in regards to LRH - which does not exist today.
> 
> The question everyone needs to answer is "is what has so far been sent
> better than no policy?"  Do you support the general direction we are going
> in, ignoring the nits which can easily be fixed?

The general direction is great and I think this update to the proposal is a
huge improvement on v1.0, but do not support the policy proposal as it
stands because it still has critical problems.  The most important of these
problems is a discussion / decision about what to do with registration
services for legacy resource holders / legacy resources who do not engage
with the RIPE NCC.  There are other serious problems with the proposal too,
and a couple of nits which are easily fixable.

Nick