This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ncc-services-wg] comments on proposal 2012-07
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] comments on proposal 2012-07
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] New RIPE NCC PGP Key
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nick Hilliard
nick at netability.ie
Mon Dec 23 13:07:20 CET 2013
On 23/12/2013 11:29, Bijal Sanghani wrote: > We've asked the RIPE NCC for some clarity on your comments regarding > section 3.0 in the policy proposal, please see Athina's reply below: [...] > “This definition gives a non-exclusive list of services. Other services, > both current and future, may also be considered Registration Services. > This proposal does not specify the process according to which a service > (other than those listed) is identified as Registration Services. > Therefore, the RIPE NCC will make this decision after consultation with > the membership and RIPE Community.” [...] > Therefore we believe that an addition of a term that includes > automatically new services to the contract with legacy holders would > contradict the other term of the proposal (about the specification of > the services in respect of each resource identified). ok, i see the reasoning behind this and withdraw my concerns about sections 3.0 and 2.4. Nick
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] comments on proposal 2012-07
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] New RIPE NCC PGP Key
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]