[ncc-services-wg] comments on proposal 2012-07

On 23/12/2013 11:29, Bijal Sanghani wrote:
> We've asked the RIPE NCC for some clarity on your comments regarding
> section 3.0 in the policy proposal, please see Athina's reply below:
[...]
> “This definition gives a non-exclusive list of services. Other services,
> both current and future, may also be considered Registration Services.
> This proposal does not specify the process according to which a service
> (other than those listed) is identified as Registration Services.
> Therefore, the RIPE NCC will make this decision after consultation with
> the membership and RIPE Community.”
[...]
> Therefore we believe that an addition of a term that includes
> automatically new services to the contract with legacy holders would
> contradict the other term of the proposal (about the specification of
> the services in respect of each resource identified).

ok, i see the reasoning behind this and withdraw my concerns about sections
3.0 and 2.4.

Nick