This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ncc-services-wg] Requirement for fax numbers in LIR Portal
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Requirement for fax numbers in LIR Portal
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Requirement for fax numbers in LIR Portal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jim Reid
jim at rfc1035.com
Fri Aug 30 11:35:14 CEST 2013
On 30 Aug 2013, at 08:40, Jeffrey Race <jrace at attglobal.net> wrote: > Aside from registered postal mail, it is the only method > of record communication generating a legally valid > receipt of communication, so it is highly advisable to > retain this requirement. Even if this is true -- for all jurisdictions in the NCC service region? -- I am unable to invent a scenario where the NCC would have to use fax instead of registered snail-mail for such "legally valid" communication with one of its members. Members who are still living in the 1980s or have legal systems forcing them to do that are of course welcome to add an optional fax number to their contact data. Nobody else should bother.
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Requirement for fax numbers in LIR Portal
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Requirement for fax numbers in LIR Portal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]