This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ncc-services-wg@ripe.net/
[ncc-services-wg] Certifying of PI End User Address Space
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Certifying of PI End User Address Space
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] [training] RIPE NCC Webinars - new dates
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nigel Titley
nigel at titley.com
Fri Apr 12 18:19:17 CEST 2013
On 12/04/2013 11:15, Erik Bais wrote: > Hi Randy, > >> i am a bit confused, which of course is my normal state. but someone >> has to say it. > I'm sure it isn't just you who is a bit confused here Randy, I'm somewhat younger and I'm a bit confused as well. > > This has been going from policy to member vote to 'Feedback Request by NCC' to board. > And now it back to policy ? Anyhow ... No, PI certification has never had a policy proposal. This went straight from "Operational consultation by NCC" to "Discussion on the ncc-services list" to "Board decision not to offer the service without a community policy" > > On the part of process, the question that we should have an answer to is: (I think) Should 'nonmember address space' be eligible for certification. Indeed. Feel free to propose a policy > > I specifically phrased it as nonmember, as we will not only have PI End-Users, but we might also have legacy space holders that might want to do so. > > I'm willing to put that on a policy proposal and see where we end up. Excellent. Please go ahead Nigel
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Certifying of PI End User Address Space
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] [training] RIPE NCC Webinars - new dates
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]