[ncc-services-wg] Questions about the fax the RIPE NCC received from United Against Nuclear Iran (UANI).

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 19.09.2012 09:31, Carsten Schiefner wrote:
> Michael,
> 
> could we *PLEASE* refrain from using taunting descriptions for
> (groups of) people like the following:

Agreed, yes, sorry for that.
But the subject drove me to such words..
The content of this letter that ridiculous, that it's very hard to
find the right words.

(I still think it should have just put into the bin, without even
thinking or talking about in the free part of the world)

I still havent understood, why the author of this braindead letter is
quoted as "ambassador" (ambassador for whom or what??)

If one founds "United against wasting IPv4" now and calls himself
ambassador, would it be taken serious?

On 19.09.2012 14:47, Kurt Kayser wrote:
> .. I believe it's time to get up and find supporters to continue
> the free Internet as we have known it for almost 30 years now.
+1

If a court decides that (any!) RIR/LIR has to block a country based on
trading-laws (or smthg. like that) the Internet begins to fail.
This won't happen, I'm pretty sure about that! (and its also still
useless as criminal minds will find a "workaround")

But where if not here, could this be clearly said and discussed..

Michael

PS/BTW, back on topic of this ML: this popped up during this
discussion in my brain, thinking about the real backgrounds:

Anyone who thinks it's useful to talk about (long-term!) Root-CA
services by (RIR)/RIPE?
Instead of commercial instances that just print money and sell them in
case without anything (just price) to dictators like *.google.com


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlBZ4bQACgkQaWRHV2kMuAKBQwCg6b2nRVvOl5OgMte4Ii/SjzBc
cm8AoIObWhIOtnwbiMkry3GAdI7DgfFP
=qMLo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----