This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ncc-services-wg] Questions about the fax the RIPE NCC received from United Against Nuclear Iran (UANI).
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Questions about the fax the RIPE NCC received from United Against Nuclear Iran (UANI).
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Questions about the fax the RIPE NCC received from United Against Nuclear Iran (UANI).
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Carsten Schiefner
ripe-wgs.cs at schiefner.de
Wed Sep 19 11:59:52 CEST 2012
On 19.09.2012 12:02, Sascha Luck wrote: > The NCC PR states that they've been in contact with the Dutch trade > ministry and are in compliance with regs so far. However, depending on > how things play out on the geopolitical stage, > this may not always be the case. Wouldn't it be interesting to hear a > talk some time on the subject from RIRs who've already had to deal with > these situations? Maybe ARIN (Cuba) or APNIC (North Korea)? +1 I'd be very interested to hear some more details here from the ARIN and/or APNIC colleagues. Thanks and best, Carsten
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Questions about the fax the RIPE NCC received from United Against Nuclear Iran (UANI).
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Questions about the fax the RIPE NCC received from United Against Nuclear Iran (UANI).
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]