This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ncc-services-wg] Policy proposal for services to legacy Internet resource holders
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Policy proposal for services to legacy Internet resource holders
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Policy proposal for services to legacy Internet resource holders
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Niall O'Reilly
Niall.oReilly at ucd.ie
Thu Aug 30 12:41:24 CEST 2012
On 30 Aug 2012, at 11:00, Havard Eidnes wrote: > Therefore, I think I agree with what Daniel Karrenberg said about > what the present discussion should be about, I'm quoting: > > So what we have to decide as a community is: under which policies > does the RIPE community allow legacy space holders to register > their address space in the RIPE Internet Number registry. Nothing > more, nothing less. > > All other questions are secondary. Resolving conflicts about the > holdership/use of the address space is a non issue. Past agreements > about allocation of address space are a non issue. [...] > > (I have a question of terminology that I'll bring up in a separate > message.) I think I agree too. Background work on a new version of the policy proposal has begun. It is premature for me to say more at this stage. Best regards, Niall
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Policy proposal for services to legacy Internet resource holders
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Policy proposal for services to legacy Internet resource holders
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]