[ncc-services-wg] Policy proposal for services to legacy Internet resource holders

On 29/08/2012 17:09, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
> As much as it would appear fun and amusing to make il.iucc into a punching
> bag for RIPE NCC legacy  policy

Hank, I'm surprised and saddened that you think that I intended to poke fun
at IUCC or turn it into a punching bag.  This was genuinely not my
intention and I think I made this clear in previous emails:

"I'm not fishing for answers to these specific questions, btw.  I'm
interested in the general issue"...

and:

"I'm not trying to be confrontational here.  There's an important
issue which I'm trying to get to the bottom of, namely the issue of where
the rights and responsibilities lie between the address assignees and their
historical registrars."

If I've offended you or cause offence to IUCC or its members by using your
good name as an example, please accept my sincere and unconditional
apologies.  My intention was solely to discover, not to offend.

> in addition to ideas stated here to take
> away our legacy IP allocations and give us /22s and force us to use NAT and
> reengineer our 10,000 node university networks

No idea where this idea came from.  No-one has ever suggested this or even
remotely implied it.  Quite the opposite in fact.

> I think I will stop posting
> here and await to see what general policy is accepted by RIPE NCC for
> legacy IP space.

Please don't.  Your contributions are valuable.

Nick