[ncc-services-wg] Policy proposal for services to legacy Internet resource holders

At 12:43 29/08/2012 +0100, Nigel Titley wrote:

>>due to the way RPSL-authentication and DNS tree'ing work, this is not
>>easy to do in a non-hierarchical structure, so "having this done by
>>the RIPE NCC" makes sense from a technical point of view.
>>
>>OTOH, I can see that the NCC wants to see some money in exchange for
>>the expenses running all this (and that seems to make sense as well :-) ).
>Yes, and bear in mind ultimately the RIPE NCC membership should be 
>consulted about this. It's their money providing the service.

As a long standing paying member of RIPE NCC, IUCC is willing to pay an 
additional amount above its current payment level in order to include its 
legacy blocks under its LIR.   It is just open to debate what that level of 
payment should be.

-Hank