This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ncc-services-wg] Policy proposal for services to legacy Internet resource holders
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Policy proposal for services to legacy Internet resource holders
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Policy proposal for services to legacy Internet resource holders
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Carsten Schiefner
ripe-wgs.cs at schiefner.de
Wed Aug 29 14:09:03 CEST 2012
Hi Nigel, On 29.08.2012 13:59, Nigel Titley wrote: >> maybe it should be looked at the other way round: that legacy space >> holders as good netizens want to unilaterally move this address space >> under a policy, given that the policy serves their needs and views? > Well, actually the proposal explicitly precludes moving the address > space under normal address policy. It explicitly says that "...[such > future revisions] must never restrict the rights of Legacy Resource > Holders to their legacy resources." that is why I wrote "under _A_ policy" - that doesn't necessarily mean normal address policy. :-) Best, -C.
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Policy proposal for services to legacy Internet resource holders
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Policy proposal for services to legacy Internet resource holders
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]