This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ncc-services-wg] Policy proposal for services to legacy Internet resource holders
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Policy proposal for services to legacy Internet resource holders
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Policy proposal for services to legacy Internet resource holders
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nigel Titley
nigel at titley.com
Wed Aug 29 12:21:00 CEST 2012
On 29/08/2012 11:14, Randy Bush wrote: >> if RIPE policy doesn't apply to legacy space, why are the legacy >> holders raising a proposal at all? > because the founding fathers and mothers, who have been quietly minding > their own business for a couple of decades received nasty letters from > the ncc? The person at the NCC who sent those letters has had a sharp kick up the posterior. > > because the founding partents actually are trying to be part of the > family of their children and grandchildren? Indeed... but I was asking a more fundamental question. If the PDP has no jurisdiction over the legacy holders then why are the legacy holders invoking a process which they are avowing has no jurisdiction over them? Please understand this is a somewhat mischievious question, but one that I feel needs to be answered. Nigel > > randy
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Policy proposal for services to legacy Internet resource holders
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Policy proposal for services to legacy Internet resource holders
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]