This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ncc-services-wg@ripe.net/
[ncc-services-wg] Policy proposal for services to legacy Internet resource holders
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Policy proposal for services to legacy Internet resource holders
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Policy proposal for services to legacy Internet resource holders
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nigel Titley
nigel at titley.com
Wed Aug 29 12:08:27 CEST 2012
On 29/08/2012 10:18, Jim Reid wrote: > On 29 Aug 2012, at 10:05, Gert Doering wrote: > >> ERX space has not been given out under RIPE policies, so they do not >> apply. Period. There is no law, legal contract, or anything else that >> would make RIPE policies automagically apply to ERX space > > +1000. > > It's a great pity the recent policy proposal doesn't use those very > words. > > This actually raises an interesting issue. Are there any circumstances in which RIPE policy would apply to legacy space? Could, for example, the AP-WG unilaterally propose a policy that annexed legacy space? I've heard this suggested several times. And of course, if RIPE policy doesn't apply to legacy space, why are the legacy holders raising a proposal at all? Nigel
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Policy proposal for services to legacy Internet resource holders
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Policy proposal for services to legacy Internet resource holders
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]