This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ncc-services-wg] Policy proposal for services to legacy Internet resource holders
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Policy proposal for services to legacy Internet resource holders
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Policy proposal for services to legacy Internet resource holders
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Lindqvist Kurt Erik
kurtis at kurtis.pp.se
Fri Aug 24 12:32:59 CEST 2012
On 23 aug 2012, at 19:16, Niall O'Reilly <Niall.oReilly at ucd.ie> wrote: > On 23 Aug 2012, at 17:50, Nigel Titley wrote: > >> I'm assuming that Niall et al will refactor the proposal and > > Soon. > If anyone would like to add their early comments to those from Tore and Daniel, > they will be welcome off-list or on, and we'll take them into account. > > Thanks to Tore and Daniel for theirs. I have a proposed clarity I like to see added. The document very briefly talks about how and under what conditions these legacy blocks where allocated. I think the document would benefit with clarifying this a bit further. I.e what's the relationship to the IANA registry, to the IR registry, RFC1174 and RFC1466. What happens if the IETF updates the IPv4 registry with a new RFC etc etc. Best regards, - kurtis -
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Policy proposal for services to legacy Internet resource holders
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Policy proposal for services to legacy Internet resource holders
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]