This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ncc-services-wg] Re: personal data in the NCC
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] personal data in the NCC
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Re: Re: personal data in the NCC
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jim Reid
jim at rfc1035.com
Thu Oct 21 14:49:46 CEST 2010
On 20 Oct 2010, at 20:29, Daniel Roesen wrote: > I will definately NOT send a plain copy of my passport around. +1. > Nowhere else is such a drastic measure ever required, except buying > ammunition > and firearms via mailorder. Clearly you've never tried buying beer at a US stadium.... Or opened a bank account recently. :-( > Asking for that to get a few numbers assigned is plain over the top. I sort of agree. But there are trade-offs here. If you don't like the current policy, you are welcome to suggest changes. The policy making machinery is open to everyone. > [and RIPE NCC wouldn't be able to verify the validity of that ID copy > anyway, so this is bogus in the first place] Not quite. Demanding passports may well be unreasonable. [I wonder how this policy can be applied to people who don't have passports or driving licences and live in enlightened countries that don't have ID cards?] However, the NCC does need to have some way of verifying the identity the other party to the agreement. A government-issued identity document is the easiest way to do that. Perhaps there could be (electronic?) alternatives: eg PGP signatures signed by someone already known to the NCC.
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] personal data in the NCC
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Re: Re: personal data in the NCC
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]