This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ncc-services-wg@ripe.net/
[ncc-services-wg] IP geolocation services
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] IP geolocation services
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] IP geolocation services
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Per Heldal
heldal at eml.cc
Wed Oct 28 11:41:03 CET 2009
On 10/28/2009 11:22 AM, konradpl at zt.piotrkow.tpsa.pl wrote: >> aggregation? > > No change - if you today advertise prefix you will still advertise it > with the same mask. The only change is that geocommunity will be added. > > If you today advertise more specific prefix from different country you > will add different geocommunity to show to the world that origin country > for the whole less specific from LIR database is not applicable to it. > > Konrad Plich And how will those networks who only see my aggregate be able to know the exact location of all my specifics? What you're suggesting is just one more incomplete source of information from which geoloc services can try to collect some coherent information (along with dns and inetnum-db). I read this thread as a request to help provide guaranteed accurate geoloc info, and BGP isn't the place for that. //per
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] IP geolocation services
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] IP geolocation services
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]