[ncc-services-wg] Re: [members-discuss] RIPE NCC response time

At 07:45 AM 22-06-09 +0200, Patrick Kambach wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>hi Hank,
>
>yes, the response time listed in the graph are not "accurate". Regarding
>the "moves" from LIR to LIR I got the following reply on my own request:
>
>- ---
>We did not forget about your request. We are currently drafting a
>procedure document for this process which will become publicly
>available soon. As soon as the procedure has been published we will
>move the resources in question from de.xxxxx over to
>de.connectingbytes as requested.
>- ---
>
>So I guess it will just take some time. That it didn't come into the
>RIPE's mind, that *some* LIR's will have to move some PI / ASN is
>"strange" ;)

They did consider it as detailed in section B of Impact of Policy on RIPE 
NCC Operations/Services inside:
http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2007-01.html

I guess from Aug 2008 till now hasn't been enough time for RIPE NCC to get 
up to speed on this.

Nonetheless, that doesn't excuse their "altering" their response time stats 
to show stellar response time.

-Hank