This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ncc-services-wg@ripe.net/
[ncc-services-wg] Complaint: Overly complicated when requesting PI space
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Complaint: Overly complicated when requesting PI space
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ncc-services-wg] Complaint: Overly complicated when requesting PI space
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jeroen Wunnink
jeroen at easyhosting.nl
Thu Jul 16 10:00:32 CEST 2009
Hi Laura, Thanks, I already got into a discussion with Alex Le Heux, the policy implementation coordinator. My initial mail is meant to open a bit of a discussion on questions asked for PI allocations, mainly because I had to pull customer and growth statistics from my own customer that were none of my business to be honest. The situation is so, that we're a fairly large hosting and colocation provider, not the biggest by far but we come a long way in the dutch market. We have several smaller customers that rent a bunch of 19" racks but are usually in the same market as we are. So when a customer becomes bigger, we try and help and give some pointers to for example start routing themselves. We have very good relations with our customers, but once I have to pull detailed growth and customer statistics from our customers, it gets kinda awkward. Because these really aren't any of my (or RIPE's for that matter) business. I'm all for responsible allocation of resources, but it should really stop at asking expected growth for IP space and how subnets are to be allocated. I got pointed to the rule 'A customer cannot hold more then 2 IP addresses in the PI space', what's up with that ? This means that a customer with three SSL webshops and three IP's isn't allowed host his server in that PI range ? Also an eyebrow raiser : 'Your customer should become LIR himself'. So now I'd have to make up a story to justify a /21 for him (which he doesn't need yet) rather then a /24 + AS, which is the bare minimum to start routing on the internet ? I know it's all policy to hand out resources as good and honestly as possible, but (and this opinion is shared by more Dutch network operators I spoke with today) requesting PI space feels like pulling teeth and takes up far too much time like this. Laura Cobley wrote: > Dear Jeroen, Florian and all, > > The RIPE NCC has an internal escalation procedure for handling > concerns about the way your request has been handled. You can ask for > any request to be escalated by sending an email to hostmaster at ripe.net > and quoting the relevant NCC# ticket number. Your request will then be > reviewed and assessed by senior staff. > > If your concern is of a more serious nature, please refer to the RIPE > NCC's Conflict Arbitration Procedure available online at: > http://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/arbitration.html > > Regards, > > Laura Cobley > RIPE NCC Registration Services > > > Jeroen Wunnink wrote: >> Hello Members, >> >> I'd like to state a complaint toward overly complicated issues with >> requesting PI space as a LIR for a customer. >> >> Situation: I have a customer who's purchased a router and wants his >> own IP space+AS number to start multihoming. Since he's pretty new to >> routing and policies of RIPE and managing the database to keep things >> going, we as LIR offered him to do this for him at the startup phase. >> Currently he'll be hosting several services from within our PA ranges >> and will start growing his new resources in the PI space he wants. >> >> After filling in the request forms, his AS got approved pending the >> PI /24 range assignment. And that's been a process that's currently >> becoming something ridiculous. >> >> Initially I got some return questions on how the subnets would be >> sliced up, what would be used for management of the routers, if IP's >> are being assigned statically or dynamically, how much IP's a >> customer would use and if PA space is being returned. Questions >> (except for the 'how much IP's will a customer use') I can understand >> and all answered. >> >> Then in a follow-up I got asked what the montly growth is, who's >> administratively responsible for the IP's and how they're going to be >> used on the servers. >> >> Then in a next follow up I got pointed to using PA space either from >> us or a different provider or that the customer should become LIR >> himself since we as LIR cannot sub-allocate PI space. (something >> that's not intended in the first place at all, we just administer it >> on a contract base until he understands procedures) >> >> And then after explaining that we will only help the customer on >> contract base and not sub-allocate anything, another follow-up comes >> that no customer can use more then 1 or 2 IP's and once again a >> question on how many servers are involved here. >> >> And that's where I'm at now. I've been trying to request PI space for >> our customer since last friday, and in my opinion there's too much >> meddling into internal business by RIPE here and this is taking a >> ridiculous amount of time and communication. >> >> As a LIR we hand out IP space responsibly to our customers, for a >> good technical and administrative reason we have a customer who wants >> his own PI assignment and I'm asking him questions about his business >> that lean towards a company secret. In my opinion RIPE has absolutely >> no business in asking how many customers and/or servers someone has >> and stating that a customer can not use >2 IP's in that PI space >> (what if someone has *gasp* 3 SSL websites ?, I cannot imagine that >> happening.., ever). >> >> Also neither we or our customer has a crystal ball to see in the >> future, so sure I can tell the amount of customer growth I'll be >> expecting or HOPING to see, but come on. >> >> I know IPv4 space must be handed out responsibly, but this is >> seriously going too far, especially for a LIR. Supposedly I cannot >> give a routing-reason for requesting PI space, but part of that IS >> important on why I'm requesting it. It's really not desirable for us >> AND for my customer to chop out a part of my PA space and announce in >> smaller chunks from his own AS on the same exchange points we're on >> and this customer is NOT at the stage yet to become a full LIR himself. >> >> -- Met vriendelijke groet, Jeroen Wunnink, EasyHosting B.V. Systeembeheerder systeembeheer at easyhosting.nl telefoon:+31 (035) 6285455 Postbus 48 fax: +31 (035) 6838242 3755 ZG Eemnes http://www.easyhosting.nl http://www.easycolocate.nl
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Complaint: Overly complicated when requesting PI space
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ncc-services-wg] Complaint: Overly complicated when requesting PI space
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]