This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ncc-services-wg] reverseDNS problem alerts - to be discussed in "Services" or "DNS" WG
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] RIPE NCC statement on changes in the RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2009
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Re: reverseDNS problem alerts - to be discussed in "Services" or "DNS" WG
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet
Woeber at CC.UniVie.ac.at
Tue Nov 18 09:45:53 CET 2008
Dear all,
I am following up internally on a couple of (minor) issues
related to reverse DNS configuration mechanisms.
Amongst others I am looking for clarification regarding:
- misleading(?) text in alert messsages, related to IPv6
- selection of master server to transfer zones from
- loose ends in config automation for legacy address space
What is the appropriate list or WG to raise these issues -
the NCC-Services WG or the DNS WG?
Thanks,
Wilfried
PS: I could certainly take this up privately with the NCC's staff,
but I guess some of these aspects might be of interest to the
community, too.
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] RIPE NCC statement on changes in the RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2009
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Re: reverseDNS problem alerts - to be discussed in "Services" or "DNS" WG
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]