This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ncc-services-wg] querying national infrastructure
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] querying national infrastructure
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] querying national infrastructure
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Niall O'Reilly
Niall.oReilly at ucd.ie
Thu Oct 18 11:45:57 CEST 2007
On 18 Oct 2007, at 08:50, Jim Reid wrote: > [Carsten Schiefner wrote] >> Rather it would only do so at the active and explicit request of >> the respective ENUM Tier 1 registry - which turns your argument >> upside-down IMHO. > > Er, it was me who was recommending that any monitoring would only > be done at the request of the Administration concerned. For some > vague definition of "Administration" which could include the Tier1 > registry. From all of this discussion, I suggest the following three points as a basis for agreement. (1) Clarity on the "service envelope" for DNSMON is desirable; (2) Tier-1 ENUM zones are eligible for monitoring by DNSMON; (3) A request for DNSMON monitoring of a Tier-1 ENUM zone will be accepted from a "responsible party" ("Administration", Tier-1 operator, National Regulator, ...) relevant to the zone in question. I hope this helps. /Niall -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: PGP.sig Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 186 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: </ripe/mail/archives/ncc-services-wg/attachments/20071018/c64dd77b/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] querying national infrastructure
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] querying national infrastructure
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]