This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ncc-services-wg] Clean up of unreferenced person/role objects
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Clean up of unreferenced person/role objects
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Re: [ncc-services-wg] Clean up of unreferenced person/role objects
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Andy Davidson
andy at nosignal.org
Sun Apr 22 20:58:37 CEST 2007
On 18 Apr 2007, at 07:34, Denis Walker wrote: > According to our database consistency statistics program (dbconstat > [1]) we > currently have 460,573 unreferenced person/role objects [2]. Some > of these > may be maintained, but are still unreferenced. Any personal data not > referenced by Internet resources do not fit within the purpose of > the RIPE > Database. They should not be stored in the RIPE Database beyond a > reasonable > 'work in progress' period. > Do you have any data on the age of these unreferenced people/ objects ? I don't get warm-and-fuzzies from the thought of deleting objects.... On 19 Apr 2007, at 13:11, Leo Vegoda wrote: > This case could also be avoided by making it impossible to re-use a > nic-hdl. > I used to work for LIR-X and now I'm working for new LIR-Y. Whilst internal paperwork is done my person object is orphaned, but I a. want to keep my handle b. want to keep my maintainer stuff intact Please lets try to understand why objects are orphaned before we take a bullet to them. cheers -a
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Clean up of unreferenced person/role objects
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Re: [ncc-services-wg] Clean up of unreferenced person/role objects
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]