This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ncc-services-wg] [db-wg] Re: RIPE52 DB-WG Draft Agenda V3
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Re: RIPE52 DB-WG Draft Agenda V3
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] [db-wg] Re: RIPE52 DB-WG Draft Agenda V3
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet
Woeber at CC.UniVie.ac.at
Thu Apr 20 07:09:35 CEST 2006
hi Niall, Niall O'Reilly wrote: > > On 19 Apr 2006, at 15:08, Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet wrote: Option 3 >> Z. AOB > > > I'm not sure whether this is within scope, or Option 1 > better mentioned in the NCC-services WG, Option 2 > or just simply discussed over coffee with an NCC person. > > A colleague in a sister organization here in Ireland has recently had > an experience which leads me to think that it would be useful to have > some consistency checking between address assignments and the > corresponding IN-ADDR.ARPA domains, at least at the /16 level. > > See you all next week. > > /Niall Let us try to do (2) first, then maybe (1), both before Friday morning. Then we can still do (3) and try to bring it up in DB under AOB. Wilfried.
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Re: RIPE52 DB-WG Draft Agenda V3
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] [db-wg] Re: RIPE52 DB-WG Draft Agenda V3
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]