This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ncc-services-wg@ripe.net/
[ncc-services-wg] Feature request
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Feature request
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Feature request
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Denesh Bhabuta
denesh at cyberstrider.net
Fri Sep 16 17:42:37 CEST 2005
On १६-०९-२००५, at ३:४७ अपराह्न, Andre Koopal wrote: > To be honest, I don't think it is resonable for the ISP to remove the > inetnum's from the RIPE db, as the customer 'owns' the resources. OK, let's say the ISP/LIR does the PI application etc for the customer and agrees with the customer that he/she will be charged x amount per year for the facility (seeing as ISP/LIR membership size and membership fee depends on number of allocations within LIR membership so LIR quite rightly wants to recoup some of this cost). So, if LIR no longer has any control over the PI space via any sort of MNT, why should PI space still reside within LIR membership 'account' and continue contributing to membership size? Either ISP/ LIR should be able to remove PI Space from their membership or not be indirectly charged for it. Please correct me if I am wrong. :-) Regards Denesh
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Feature request
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Feature request
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]