This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ncc-services-wg@ripe.net/
[ncc-services-wg] NCC service request - ticket robot test facility
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] NCC service request - ticket robot test facility
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] NCC service request - ticket robot test facility
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Andre Koopal
andre.koopal at nld.mci.com
Thu Oct 20 17:16:34 CEST 2005
On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 04:34:06PM +0200, gstammw at gmx.net wrote: > Hello, > > I think that this would be a nice feature in general but also a waste of > money since one can use the original robot in combination with a > test-object or something like that. > Better save the money. > > Gunther > I don't see much extra costs involved here, just a clone off the current software with some different settings, and an alias in the aliasfile. It can most probably just run on the same machine. I would say go for it, it is much better to be able to test against a test service. Of course it does need to simulate everything, including generating a ticket you can reply on. Regards, Andre Koopal MCI
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] NCC service request - ticket robot test facility
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] NCC service request - ticket robot test facility
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]