This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ncc-services-wg@ripe.net/
[ncc-services-wg] Admin: request for "Company Registration documents"
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Admin: request for "Company Registration documents"
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Admin: request for "Company Registration documents"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Fri Oct 14 19:13:28 CEST 2005
> I was arguing that as the LIRs are the ones that (in the majority of > the cases) submit the data to the RIPE DB, and more often are also > listed instead of their customers (DSL blocks), and they have a > documented relationship with the NCC, proving the identity of the LIR > will help (partly) securing the trail to the owner of and allocated > addressblock. In asking for the papers this does help the NCC to > establish that trail. Which I believe is a good thing. what is the identity of an lir? try looking at, for example, the issues being raised in http://www.identity20.com/media/OSCON2005/ randy
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Admin: request for "Company Registration documents"
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Admin: request for "Company Registration documents"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]