This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ncc-services-wg@ripe.net/
[ncc-services-wg] E-mail Client Testing for S/MIME Compliance
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] E-mail Client Testing for S/MIME Compliance
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] E-mail Client Testing for S/MIME Compliance
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hank Nussbacher
hank at att.net.il
Thu Jan 8 19:43:17 CET 2004
On Thu, 8 Jan 2004, Mally Mclane wrote: Very strange that Eudora came in 5th in Appendix B1.1 and 4th according to B1.2 but didn't warrant a test vs. Lotus, Mozilla, The Bat, and Mulberry that came out below Eudora but did warrant a test. Stranger is that section 7 shows that Eudora was tested but in section 4 I can't find any Eudora results. -Hank > Hi Denis, > > --On 08 January 2004 17:46 +0100 Denis Walker <denis at ripe.net> wrote: > > > The results of this study can be found on our web site at: > > > > http://www.ripe.net/ripencc/pub- services/db/mail_client_tests.html > > It seems you didn't test Microsoft Outlook, just Outlook Express? As these > are two very different products, was there a reason for this, just I would > have thought Microsoft Outlook would have been very widely used... > > > Rgds, > > > Mally Mclane > JANET-CERT >
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] E-mail Client Testing for S/MIME Compliance
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] E-mail Client Testing for S/MIME Compliance
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]