This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ncc-services-wg@ripe.net/
[ncc-services-wg] Improved Secure Communication for Registration Services (RS) Mailboxes
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Improved Secure Communication for Registration Services (RS) Mailboxes
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Improved Secure Communication for Registration Services (RS) Mailboxes
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Havard Eidnes
he at uninett.no
Wed Feb 25 16:45:48 CET 2004
Hi, I'll have to agree with Måns; forcing X.509 handling and software as the only option for securing e-mail with the registration services mailboxes onto the LIR community is not something I see as particularly welcome. Today the LIRs have the option of securing communication with auto-dbm using PGP. This means that there is some deployment in the LIR community for using PGP already. Thus, I'm puzzled why the option of continuing to use PGP with the registration services mailboxes (hostmaster at ripe.net etc.) is not on the table as options. Yes, I can see there would be problems, but I have not seen any discussion which makes it clear why these problems are insurmountable (and I doubt they are). I'll admit that I'm not familiar with usage of S/MIME in e-mail, so I don't know how invasive usage of that is going to be. However, it seems clear to me that if introduction of S/MIME and X.509 will impose restrictions on what e-mail clients can be used, one is intruding on an area where there may be emotional reactions, and the proposal as it stands does not really address those issues. I'll concede, though, that on the WEB, it would seem that X.509 usage in the form of https is the only viable option, but then again, that's not what we're discussing here, right? Regards, - Håvard
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Improved Secure Communication for Registration Services (RS) Mailboxes
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Improved Secure Communication for Registration Services (RS) Mailboxes
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]