This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ncc-services-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] New Draft Document: De-boganising New AddressBlocks
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] New Draft Document: De-boganising New Address Blocks
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] New Draft Document: De-boganising New AddressBlocks
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Andre Oppermann
oppermann at pipeline.ch
Wed Feb 25 16:43:05 CET 2004
"Barry Greene (bgreene)" wrote: > > > > Andre is right, the best solution is definitely not to filter bogons. > > It does not seem people are getting at the core of the problem. Prefix > filtering the IANA reserved space was a reactionary consequence - not > something ISPs did on a whim. All I'm seeing is people being upset over > the consequence of the reactionary consequence of IANA Reserved with out > getting to the crux of the problem. Ok, it seems like a) filtering of IANA reserved prefixes creates more problems than it solves. b) noboby has named the "crux" of the problem yet. -- Andre
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] New Draft Document: De-boganising New Address Blocks
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] New Draft Document: De-boganising New AddressBlocks
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]