This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ncc-services-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] New Draft Document: De-boganising New AddressBlocks
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] New Draft Document: De-boganising New AddressBlocks
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] RE: [address-policy-wg] New Draft Document: De-boganising New AddressBlocks
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Daniel Karrenberg
daniel.karrenberg at ripe.net
Wed Feb 25 15:20:04 CET 2004
On 24.02 17:56, Jerome Fleury wrote: > ... > I'm very angry > about RIPE and IANA allocating those blocks too quickly, without any vision of consequences for > LIRs, and without any communications going down from Tier1 to the smallest company. What would be an appropriate timing in your opinion? Daniel
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] New Draft Document: De-boganising New AddressBlocks
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] RE: [address-policy-wg] New Draft Document: De-boganising New AddressBlocks
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]