[ncc-services-wg] Improved Secure Communication for Registration Services (RS) Mailboxes

Hi!

> >>> X.509 is not the way to go. [...]

> > find pgp easier to deploy and use.  some will provide x.509 easier.
> > so the rirs accepting *both* would be good.

> > randy, a pgp kinda guy who also uses x.509 occasionally

> I am kind of puzzled here.
[...]
> So, I am bit surprised that people are start having views -now-.

Sorry for this. It's just that there are so many discussions
to have in parallel that it's difficult to follow up in time
to some of them. I already raised my voice the last time
x.509 came up, that's why I raised it again.

We're only a small LIR, and we already see the burden of
having to many "standards" to chose from. As of know, RIPE
was steering the course with a clean (sub-)set, and it
was OK for us.

We do not have the time to attend RIPE meetings more than
once every few years, if at all.

-- 
MfG/Best regards, Kurt Jaeger                                  16 years to go !
LF.net GmbH        fon +49 711 90074-23  pi at LF.net  
Ruppmannstr. 27    fax +49 711 90074-33
D-70565 Stuttgart  mob +49 171 3101372