This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ncc-services-wg] Re: [dns-wg] Re: dnsmon / .org
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Re: [dns-wg] Re: dnsmon / .org
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Re: [dns-wg] Re: dnsmon / .org
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Daniel Karrenberg
daniel.karrenberg at ripe.net
Wed Sep 10 17:39:01 CEST 2003
[pruned to ncc-services again] On 10.09 17:15, Johan Ihren wrote: > Daniel Karrenberg <daniel.karrenberg at ripe.net> writes: > > Who is selling DNSSEC courses? The whole point of DISI is to kick-start > > We do. I was not aware of that. So given that, should we stop DISI and other kick-start like things. Or is the benefit to the membership as-a-whole and the community more important? > PS. With the Autonomica hat on: we also do DNS monitoring, quite > similar to dnsmon, and for exactly the same reasons, i.e. to monitor > our various DNS services, i.root-servers.net being one of them. To > offset our costs for this we are offering this service on some sort of > cost recovery basis to interested parties like TLDs. Interesting. I have never seen any of it or seen it quoted anywhere. > In the end this is all about education. Everyone needs to understand > that there is a cost associated with providing a service. If the > service is offered "for free" that is just a metaphor for "someone > else is paying for it". Yes. And that someone else whould do so willingly of course. Daneil
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Re: [dns-wg] Re: dnsmon / .org
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Re: [dns-wg] Re: dnsmon / .org
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]