This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ncc-services-wg] Re: dnsmon / .org
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Re: dnsmon / .org
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Re: dnsmon / .org
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Daniel Karrenberg
daniel.karrenberg at ripe.net
Wed Sep 10 16:10:52 CEST 2003
[pruned to ncc-services] On 10.09 05:00, Randy Bush wrote: > > RIPE NCC should only monitor those ccTLDs that are LIRs or that > > their LIR is willing to endorse. > > as a lot of folk, whose primary mission it is, monitor, it is not > clear to me why the ncc monitors at all. Frankly: Because root zone data is needed for our operations, none of the people whose primary mission it is do an adaequate job, there is considerable interest in good measurements in the community including about other TLDs and it was relatively easy to do. > the philosphy that the > ncc should provide all the services that we use devolves into ncc > making shoes and shirts for us all too... I am not aware of that school. can you point me to it? Daniel
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Re: dnsmon / .org
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Re: dnsmon / .org
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]