This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ncc-services-wg@ripe.net/
[ncc-services-wg] Re: [db-wg] The New "organisation object" Proposal
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Re: [db-wg] The New "organisation object" Proposal
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Re: [db-wg] The New "organisation object" Proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Engin Gunduz
engin at ripe.net
Tue Sep 2 11:58:11 CEST 2003
Hi Joao, On 2003-08-25 14:58:47 +0200, Joao Damas wrote: [...] > > using the "org-name:" attribute of the object. The user can specify > >the > > letter combination he/she prefers. For example if the user wants > >TTR as the > > letter combination, in the organisation ID, then ORG-AUTO-1TTR > >should be > > put into "organisation:" attribute during the creation of the object. > > Yes, I read it, what I mean is whether you would consider eliminating > the part about choosing letters. This is only an identifier and it > would be good if people could think about it as just that, with no > naming implications. As the first thought, I liked the idea of eliminating the part about choosing letters. However there can be a valid use case for it: the user might want to have a specific letter combination other than the software assigns, because the latter might mean something "inappropriate" in some language by coincidence. -engin -- Engin Gunduz RIPE NCC Database Group
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Re: [db-wg] The New "organisation object" Proposal
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Re: [db-wg] The New "organisation object" Proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]