This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ncc-services-wg] Re: [db-wg] The New "organisation object" Proposal
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Re: [db-wg] The New "organisation object" Proposal
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Re: [db-wg] The New "organisation object" Proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
James Raftery
james at now.ie
Fri Aug 29 17:36:07 CEST 2003
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 09:10:56AM +0100, Sebastien Lahtinen wrote: > Attempting to number them using any generic criteria > won't work. If you want to do this, you'll have to complicate the > database/criteria significantly. I agree. For an 'organisation number' to be useful, the attribute will need to include some text to identify _what_ the number represents, be it a VAT no., company registration number or any of the myriad registration schemes & numbers for clubs, companies, partnerships, etc. in each country. We already have such a field for free text. It's ``remarks:''. Regards, james
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Re: [db-wg] The New "organisation object" Proposal
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Re: [db-wg] The New "organisation object" Proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]