This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ncc-services-wg] Re: [db-wg] The New "organisation object" Proposal
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Re: [db-wg] The New "organisation object" Proposal
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Proposed agenda
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Peter Galbavy
peter.galbavy at knowtion.net
Fri Aug 29 14:23:57 CEST 2003
Hans Petter Holen wrote: > I dont agree: the point about the attribute would be to uniquely > identify the organisation within a country. I am quite shure all > countries within the EU has this concept of org-number/vat number or > public registry number. The good thing is that it stays unique and > lives trough name changes. No, that is incorrect. In the UK (certainly England) you do *not* have to register or have a license to trade as an organisation as long as you do not trade in a deceptive way; i.e. I can set myself up now (without asking anyone for permission) to trade as "The Small Fluffy Kitten Consulting Company" and then I am done. For tax purposes I am then classed as a "sole trader". No other differences. I (and others) have been having this argument with RIPE (hi Daniel...) for many years - in the "old" days you had to provide a copy of your "Chamber of Commerce certificate". Er, closed box thinking ? Peter
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Re: [db-wg] The New "organisation object" Proposal
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Proposed agenda
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]