[ncc-services-wg] RE: [db-wg] The New "organisation object" Proposal

> >> "ALLOCATED-BY-IANA", "ALLOCATED-BY-RIR", "ALLOCATED-BY-RIR
> >> NON-PORTABLE", "ALLOCATED-BY-RIR PORTABLE" and
> >> "ALLOCATED-BY-RIR UNSPECIFIED" values.  It is optional in all
> >> other objects, and it is single valued in all objects.
> >
> > As we're talking about the use of the organisation object,
> > can we use it to show delegation path (instead of overloading
> > the status attribute above) in a resource object (i.e. aut-num,
> > inetnum and inet6num). For example, if querying an inetnum,
> > you get this response:
> >
> 
> as a user of the DB, though I see the theoretical beauty of your  
> proposal, I would rather have a concise definition in the inetnum  
> object status attribute than a heap of output that will take 
> some time to make sense of, not to mention having to scroll back and 
> forth just to see the answer to a simple question. So I prefer the 
> proposal as it is in this respect.
> 
> Joao

Thanks Joao. After thinking about it, I agree that it is more 
important to have a concise whois response. 
It's just the *-BY-IANA/RIR/LIR in the status attribute that
bugs me as we have the org-type attribute in the organisation 
object that 'begs' to be used :-)
But that's a minor point really. I'm happy to support the
proposal.

Cheers,
Sanjaya