This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ncc-services-wg] Incident Response Service (IRS) [was: Unneeded RIPE tasks] (fwd)
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Incident Response Service (IRS) [was: Unneeded RIPE tasks] (fwd)
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Incident Response Service (IRS) [was: Unneeded RIPE tasks] (fwd)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hank Nussbacher
hank at att.net.il
Mon Aug 25 09:40:58 CEST 2003
On Mon, 25 Aug 2003, Henk Uijterwaal (RIPE-NCC) wrote: > For example, earlier this year, we published a report on the impact of the > sapphire worm on the Internet.Another example is a recent discussion on > heise.de, on the unreachability on the .at ccTLD from the Telecom Austria > network, involving some fingerpointing.NIC.AT already published the > plots, but this could have been another case where we'd publish our data > in order to (in)validate a claim. I do not see ARIN or APNIC entered these kind of areas that are not "registration" orienated and as time moves on it would appear more and more RIPE services are not registration orienated. > > > > 2) is there any WG which could be polled or which has "adopted" this > > activity for definition and development (or is expected to do so)? > > As soon as the AP2004 is approved, we (Daniel K and myself) will write an > implementation document, describing the activities proposed under section > 5 in more detail.This document will be circulated to, I'd guess, the > services-WG and discussed there. And you do not see this a procedurally wrong? Wherever I work, whenever they want to do "something new", they need to write it up fully, indicate the budget and manpower needed and then submit to management. Based on that info, management can make an intelligent decision. Instead, we have 1 paragraph describing what will be done in general and once the AP2004 is approved based on that, only then do we find out how much all this cost. I don't know a single company that works like this. > > Cheers, > > Henk > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Henk Uijterwaal Email: henk.uijterwaal at ripe.net > RIPE Network Coordination Centre WWW: http://www.ripe.net/home/henk > P.O.Box 10096 Singel 258 Phone: +31.20.5354414 > 1001 EB Amsterdam 1016 AB Amsterdam Fax: +31.20.5354445 > The Netherlands The Netherlands Mobile: +31.6.55861746 > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > That problem that we weren't having yesterday, is it better? (Big ISP NOC) > > > Hank Nussbacher
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Incident Response Service (IRS) [was: Unneeded RIPE tasks] (fwd)
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Incident Response Service (IRS) [was: Unneeded RIPE tasks] (fwd)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]