This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ncc-services-wg] RIPE tasks
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] RIPE tasks
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] RIPE tasks
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Kurt Erik Lindqvist
kurtis at kurtis.pp.se
Fri Aug 22 17:18:39 CEST 2003
On onsdag, aug 20, 2003, at 17:41 Europe/Stockholm, Hank Nussbacher wrote: > On Wed, 20 Aug 2003, Kurt Erik Lindqvist wrote: > >> Are you also saying that having to have the AGM vote is a problem? In >> that case how would you else want to do it? Voting anytime through out >> the year if enough people called for a vote? That would make it more >> or >> less impossible to make or follow a budget in any reasonable way. > > One time per year is enough for membership feedback and determining the > budget for the subsequent year. I agree to this. To some extend this worries me a bit tough. We are actually taking power away from the board members that are actually elected to represent us. At the same time, with the numbers of attendants that Axel posted, I am still worried over the lack of interest from the community... - kurtis -
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] RIPE tasks
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] RIPE tasks
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]