[ncc-services-wg] RIPE tasks

>I don't to objections preceding the discussions of the budget 
>decisions, on the contrary - that is the idea with this WG.

  This is not only the idea with _one_ WG, this is a general concept which
  we (many chairs) tried to put to work for a while throuighout the
  _differnt_ WGs.

  I have to admit that _I_ have ceased eventually to put it onto my WGs
  agenda again and again, because I usually saw a few heads nodding
  approval when an activity (or it's continuation) was proposed, and no
  dissent. Maybe we should put it again onto our agenda(s) as a standing
  item...

>However, 
>the decision needs to be taken by the NCC membership alone, and not in 
>a public forum.

  The public forum is there to work on general consensus, and to gather up
  all the input from the community at large. The final decision - which
  usually is to simply agree on the proposed workplan AND TO FOOT THE BILL
  - rests with the LIRs who are going to see the invoices coming.

>This is the AGM.

  Exactly.

>Best regards,
>
>- kurtis -

  And I am still  pretty convinced that this is a good structure and the
  proper way to do it!

  Wilfried.
  (for at.aconet's EUR, and the DB-WG)