This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ncc-services-wg] RIPE tasks
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] RIPE tasks
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] RIPE tasks
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Axel Pawlik
ncc at ripe.net
Fri Aug 22 02:18:20 CEST 2003
At 21/08/2003 16:06 +0200, Joao Damas wrote: >>this means that *a* proxy cannot cast more than 2 % of the >>total possible votes. >> >>So the actual limit to proxies is n * 2%, where n is the >>number of attendees of the GM. > >Axel, > >this doesn't sound right, given that attendance has usually between 10-20 >members and I believe there are more than 0.5 proxie votes. The "2%" relate to the total votes possible, not to the number of attendees at the meeting. Each of the attendees of a General Meeting would be able to represent (in proxy) the votes of up to 2% of the total membership's votes. So Gerd is right in stating that... >I read this differently. *Each* attendee can cast 2% of all votes, so >50 members would be able to represent 100% of all LIRs.... regards, Axel
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] RIPE tasks
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] RIPE tasks
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]