[ncc-services-wg] RIPE tasks

Kurt Erik Lindqvist wrote:
> What organizations have had the same low turn-out for AGMs and
> interest in the agendas of the AGMs? Even if you could not attend the
> AGM, did you bring up the issues on the mailinglists? Remember that
> RIPE NCC is not there by it self. It is there for the reasons, and in
> the way we have choose to have it. It has changed the ways we have
> voted (or abstained from voted) it to change. We might not like the
> outcome, but the better that we are now discussing this and that we
> had the KPMG survey to act as a starting point to move on.

And why is personal attendence at an AGM required to propose and vote on
ongoing use of members funds ?

I am amazed that no one has proposed any sort of online system. Or would
that remove too much power from the professional bureaucrats that live off
RIPE ?

Peter