This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ncc-services-wg] RIPE tasks
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] RIPE tasks
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] RIPE tasks
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Kurt Erik Lindqvist
kurtis at kurtis.pp.se
Tue Aug 19 23:25:03 CEST 2003
>> that being said, i may be a minority voice among ripe ncc membership >> on >> this issue. what i am asking for is that ripe ncc break down all >> their >> functions - and "ask/poll" its paying membership which to continue and >> which not to pursue. example: if the majority are in favor of >> funding ripe >> ncc training, i will have no problem with it. i will even become an >> advocate for it. > > This is something I would agree on. Break down the functions, ask the > members, and then do what the majority wants. > Even more important. I would like to see the projects progress reported at the NCC services WG at each RIPE meeting, and perhaps also a general cost structure. Not that I want to now what each member in the project costs, but I want to see the general relationship between that project and overall cost figures. Best regards, - kurtis -
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] RIPE tasks
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] RIPE tasks
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]