[ncc-services-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: ICANN vs RIPE NCC, was Re: Summary of the PI ......

>> i agree with 1+2+4.  3 should be covered on a cost basis by the 
>> attendees.
>> if the cost of a training session is 5000euro (room, lunch, instructor
>> time, etc) and 25 attend, then the cost should be 200euro per 
>> attendee,
>> with no affect on the overall ncc budget.
>
> Hello.
>
> In the first moment, this proposal would prevent people that doesnt go 
> to
> training sessions to pay it. This would benefit the people in some
> smaller/far away countries if the NCC wouldnt have a program all around
> its service region...
>
> I dont know if im right, but i figure, that the main idea for 
> everybody to
> pay for the training is getting everybody trained -- as it is included.
> I only see one aspect/situation against it: a trained LIR person 
> exchanges
> jobs, going into a company that will manage a new LIR. In this case 
> should
> this LIR pay for the training of its already-trained human resource? 
> Or it
> is paying for the training that person got some time ago?
>
> About this topic, i have a positive feeling about the recent extending 
> of
> training courses to DNS-SEC and RRC by the NCC.

Hostmasters and LIR managers that understands the RIPE process well, 
and also gets training on how to run a LIR effectively helps the RIPE 
NCC off-load it's work, and should be considered as helping us save 
costs rather than contribute to them.

- kurtis -