This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ncc-services-wg] RIPE tasks
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] RIPE tasks
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] RIPE tasks
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Serge A. Goloborodko
ben at kharkiv.net
Wed Aug 13 22:45:19 CEST 2003
MN> Subject: Re: [ncc-services-wg] RIPE tasks Date: Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 12:08:07PM +0200 Quoting Kurt Jaeger (lists at complx.LF.net): >> >> If there had been no RIPE with crystal-clear policies as a very >> good example of self-gouvernance, many national government regulations >> would be in place instead -- and it would be a big mess. MN> Indeed -- a swedish government investigation (SOU 2002:60) concluded: MN> "In Europe it is RIPE who hands out IP address space to operators MN> and other network owners. This arrangement has proved to be working, MN> and there is no reason to alter it at the moment." MN> SOU 2002:60, page 377, my (abridged) translation. MN> Please note -- this is the investigation which writes the bill that MN> implements the EU communications directive in Sweden; they have the MN> theorethical power to suggest legislation that in effect forces all MN> IP address allocation to be made by a government authority, per MN> nation-state. I do not think we or the governements want that... It depends. Recently, Ukrainian authority has made completely another statement. Serge. -- Best regards, Serge mailto:ben at kharkiv.net
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] RIPE tasks
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] RIPE tasks
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]