This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ncc-services-wg] RIPE tasks
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] RIPE tasks
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] RIPE tasks
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Neil J. McRae
neil at COLT.NET
Wed Aug 13 15:46:12 CEST 2003
> This is something I would agree on. Break down the > functions, ask the members, and then do what the majority wants. > > Of course this doesn't mean that everybody is happy with the > result :-) > Some might say this is the situation we are in now. Frankly, I think the core part of the RIPE NCC should be something thats set in stone as much as it can be, with the other activities have a process to start and finish them that needs to have a reasonably majority of the membership in favour to approve, proposals should have an indication of the budget and how it is expected to be funded, with clear end deliverables and timescales. Regards, Neil.
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] RIPE tasks
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] RIPE tasks
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]