This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ncc-services-wg@ripe.net/
[ncc-services-wg] RIPE tasks
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] RIPE tasks
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] RIPE tasks
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hank Nussbacher
hank at att.net.il
Wed Aug 13 10:59:45 CEST 2003
At 09:53 AM 13-08-03 +0200, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > > i agree with 1+2+4. 3 should be covered on a cost basis by the attendees. > > if the cost of a training session is 5000euro (room, lunch, instructor > > time, etc) and 25 attend, then the cost should be 200euro per attendee, > > with no affect on the overall ncc budget. > >3: In some countries, 200EUR do make a difference. Are training courses >such a drain on budgets ? Better having people trained and some >sort of coherent "qualification" is available than having no >level of discussion, because everyone "saves" on that topic. I must be missing something. How does a better trained LIR in some foreign country help me do my job better? Whatever the argument would be - replace "better trained LIR", with "Cisco CCIE" when replying. -Hank >-- >MfG/Best regards, Kurt Jaeger 17 years to >go ! >LF.net GmbH fon +49 711 90074-23 pi at LF.net >Ruppmannstr. 27 fax +49 711 90074-33 >D-70565 Stuttgart mob +49 171 3101372
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] RIPE tasks
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] RIPE tasks
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]