This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ncc-services-wg@ripe.net/
[ncc-services-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: ICANN vs RIPE NCC, was Re: Summary of the PI ......
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: ICANN vs RIPE NCC, was Re: Summary of the PI ......
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: ICANN vs RIPE NCC, was Re: Summary of the PI ......
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Clive D.W. Feather
clive at demon.net
Wed Aug 13 09:28:40 CEST 2003
Peter Galbavy said: > From reading the docs a few months ago, I need to find 5% of the membership > to agree to any proposal I may make to be put before a RIPE annual meeting > I have NO communication path to approach this notional 5% as I do not have > access to a membership list, and I dislike spamming folks anyway. I don't know the relevant laws that RIPE-NCC operates under (Dutch ones, I presume). But if you were looking at the equivalent UK arrangement (a company limited by guarantee) then you are entitled to go to the Registered Office and inspect the Register of Members. You then write down [*] all the names and addresses and send them all a paper letter. I wouldn't be surprised to find there's an equivalent rule. [*] Many companies will help you do this more efficiently, for example by sending a copy of the Register in the post or electronically. But I believe the legal minimum requirement is inspection at the office. -- Clive D.W. Feather | Work: <clive at demon.net> | Tel: +44 20 8495 6138 Internet Expert | Home: <clive at davros.org> | *** NOTE CHANGE *** Demon Internet | WWW: http://www.davros.org | Fax: +44 870 051 9937 Thus plc | | Mobile: +44 7973 377646
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: ICANN vs RIPE NCC, was Re: Summary of the PI ......
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: ICANN vs RIPE NCC, was Re: Summary of the PI ......
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]