This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ncc-services-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: ICANN vs RIPE NCC, was Re: Summary of the PI ......
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: ICANN vs RIPE NCC, was Re: Summary of the PI ......
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: ICANN vs RIPE NCC, was Re: Summary of the PI ......
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Kurt Jaeger
lists at complx.LF.net
Tue Aug 12 16:42:37 CEST 2003
Hi! > >> Does anyone believe that RIPE is not a "natural monopoly" for IP registry > >> services in Europe ? > > If you look at the service comparision matrix of the different > > RIRs (as published by RIPE), you can see that apparently all of > > them offer their service to anyone, not only their regional > > constituency. > you're quite correct. in american, i believe that's called a cartel. Is this really a cartel ? There are probably different pricing schemes and rules for each RIR ? http://www.ripe.net/rs/rir-comp-matrix-rev.html So, if someone does not like RIPE NCC services, get your IPs and ASes from one of the other RIRs ? Anything that does prohibit this ? Has anyone tried yet ? -- MfG/Best regards, Kurt Jaeger 17 years to go ! LF.net GmbH fon +49 711 90074-23 pi at LF.net Ruppmannstr. 27 fax +49 711 90074-33 D-70565 Stuttgart mob +49 171 3101372
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: ICANN vs RIPE NCC, was Re: Summary of the PI ......
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: ICANN vs RIPE NCC, was Re: Summary of the PI ......
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]