Re: RIPE NCC Revenue & Charging 1996 (1.0)
- Date: Tue, 22 Aug 1995 17:04:59 +0200
- Alternate-recipient: Allowed
- X400-content-type: P2-1984 (2)
- X400-mts-identifier: [/PRMD=Switch/ADMD=Arcom/C=Ch/;chx400.swi.612:22.08.95.15.05.02]
- X400-originator: huber@localhost
- X400-received: by /PRMD=surf/ADMD=400net/C=nl/; Relayed; Tue, 22 Aug 1995 17:05:48 +0200
- X400-received: by mta relay.surfnet.nl in /PRMD=surf/ADMD=400net/C=nl/; Relayed; Tue, 22 Aug 1995 17:05:48 +0200
- X400-received: by /PRMD=Switch/ADMD=Arcom/C=Ch/; Relayed; Tue, 22 Aug 1995 17:05:02 +0200
- X400-received: by /PRMD=SWITCH/ADMD=ARCOM/C=CH/; Relayed; Tue, 22 Aug 1995 17:04:59 +0200
- X400-recipients: non-disclosure:;
Hallo Daniel,
nobody from SWITCH will be at the forthcoming NCC contributors meeting.
However we would nevertheless like to express our agreement with the proposed
financing schema for 1996:
> The Registry Fee
>
> I propose to use the same categories for local IRs
> as 1996 but to reduce the fees associated by 25% for
> ISP local IRs. This results in the following fees:
>
>
> +----------------------------------+
> | Category 1995 Fee 1996 Fee |
> +----------------------------------+
> | |
> | Large ISP 12000 9000 |
> | Medium ISP 6000 4500 |
> | Small ISP 2000 1500 |
> | |
> | Enterprise 1000 1000 |
> | |
> |Last Resort 0 0 |
> | |
> +----------------------------------+
I am generally reluctant to do usage based pricing, because this normally
leads to more work and endless discussions about whether the figures are
correct or not.
Kind regards,
Willi Huber
========================================================================
Willi Huber, SWITCH, Limmatquai 138, CH-8001 Zurich, Switzerland
INET: huber@localhost | Tel: +41 1 268 1530 | Fax: +41 1 268 1568
X.400: S=huber;O=switch;P=switch;A=arcom;C=CH