<div dir="ltr">Dear Sebastien, According to Article 18.3 of the Articles of Association, if a proposed resolution contains various options, the method of instant run-off voting is used, as described in the same article (similar to the elections of EB members). <a href="https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-818/#article-18-general-meeting-voting">https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-818/#article-18-general-meeting-voting</a> Best regards, Fergal</div> <div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 10:52 AM Sebastien Brossier <<a href="mailto:sebastien@brossier.org">sebastien@brossier.org</a>> wrote: </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">On 10/04/2024 14:54, Fergal Cunningham wrote: > The vote for this proposal would not allow all options to be rejected. > It would be run with the instant run-off vote format in the same way as > the Executive Board election is run. So members would be asked to vote > for the three options in order of preference and the scheme that > achieves more than 50% of preferences either on the first round or > second round would be deemed to have been chosen. Hi, Is this even legal, wrt the articles of association ? Holding a vote to adopt an item, without a reject option. Best regards, Sebastien Brossier _______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list <a href="mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net" target="_blank">members-discuss@ripe.net</a> <a href="https://mailman.ripe.net/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mailman.ripe.net/</a> Unsubscribe: <a href="https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/ripencc-management%40ripe.net" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/ripencc-management%40ripe.net</a> </blockquote></div>