<div dir="ltr"><p style="box-sizing:border-box;margin:0px;width:296px;font-size:13.5px;line-height:1.6em;white-space:pre-wrap;word-break:break-word;color:rgb(63,67,80);font-family:"Open Sans",sans-serif;font-style:normal;font-variant-ligatures:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:400;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:left;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;word-spacing:0px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255);text-decoration-style:initial;text-decoration-color:initial">Dear Rob,</p><p style="box-sizing:border-box;margin:0.5em 0px 0px;width:296px;font-size:13.5px;line-height:1.6em;white-space:pre-wrap;word-break:break-word;color:rgb(63,67,80);font-family:"Open Sans",sans-serif;font-style:normal;font-variant-ligatures:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:400;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:left;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;word-spacing:0px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255);text-decoration-style:initial;text-decoration-color:initial">The vote for this proposal would not allow all options to be rejected. It would be run with the instant run-off vote format in the same way as the Executive Board election is run. So members would be asked to vote for the three options in order of preference and the scheme that achieves more than 50% of preferences either on the first round or second round would be deemed to have been chosen.</p><p style="box-sizing:border-box;margin:0.5em 0px 0px;width:296px;font-size:13.5px;line-height:1.6em;white-space:pre-wrap;word-break:break-word;color:rgb(63,67,80);font-family:"Open Sans",sans-serif;font-style:normal;font-variant-ligatures:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:400;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:left;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;word-spacing:0px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255);text-decoration-style:initial;text-decoration-color:initial">Hope that helps.
<span class="gmail-mention--highlight" style="box-sizing:border-box;padding:0px 1px;border-radius:4px">Fergal</span></p></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 2:46 PM Rob Evans <<a href="mailto:rhe@nosc.ja.net">rhe@nosc.ja.net</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Hi,<br>
<br>
> Why do we not have an option that refuses any rate increases, and forces RIPE to reduce it's budget?<br>
> <br>
> Option D - No change to rates, RIPE reduces budget according to fewer number of LIR!<br>
<br>
I believe that is implicit if options A, B and C are all voted down.<br>
<br>
Rob<br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
members-discuss mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net" target="_blank">members-discuss@ripe.net</a><br>
<a href="https://mailman.ripe.net/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mailman.ripe.net/</a><br>
Unsubscribe: <a href="https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/ripencc-management%40ripe.net" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/ripencc-management%40ripe.net</a><br>
<br>
</blockquote></div>